This is a better place to start than condensate and feed.
For some reason I don’t understand I get the nerves about posting these, so I’m telling myself that they are all rough drafts and I as I get better at the software and pacing I’ll come back and do a better version.
That being said the learning cycle has to be closed for any significant improvement to be made. This means a product must be finished, and then examined for what parts of it are good and what parts are weak, and how the strong parts were executed, and how the weak parts can be improved.
*This is why all great architects do their great work so late in life: The learning cycle is often 10 years from first concept to finished product to incorporate feedback.
One of the things necessary for this to work is time to become less attached to the product. Another important ingredient is feedback (and the creator being receptive to that feedback while knowing when to ignore it and stick to the vision).
So here it is.
My intended audience is junior power plant operators who have been around valves and pumps and equipment before, but lack a big picture of how the parts are supposed to fit together.